Pricing

Pricing built around hiring complexity, not feature confusion.

ClawRecruiter is sold like an AI hiring workspace, not a pile of disconnected add-ons. Start with the workflow bottleneck that matters most, prove shortlist quality fast, then expand with deeper automation, governance, and recruiter control.

Recruiter-controlled rollout Evidence-backed evaluation Designed for pilot-to-scale motion
Typical commercial motion 30-day pilot first
Best fit Teams buried in applicant volume
Expansion path More roles, more automation, more control

Included in every plan

  • AI hiring workspace setup aligned to your process
  • Structured screening and evidence capture
  • Recruiter approval points before candidate movement
  • Rollout guidance tied to shortlist speed and quality
Commercial paths

Choose the operating model that matches your hiring motion today.

We price by how much workflow orchestration, evaluation depth, and team coordination you need, not by forcing everyone into the same bundle.

Pilot

Validation sprint

Best for lean internal teams

Use ClawRecruiter on one priority role family to validate shortlist clarity, interview completion, and recruiter time saved.

  • 1 hiring workflow or role cluster
  • Core screening and AI interview flow
  • Decision evidence pack for recruiter review
  • ROI readout at the end of the pilot
Discuss a pilot →
Enterprise

Governed scale

Best for talent ops and complex orgs

Expand across regions or business units with stronger governance, integration depth, permission models, and operational consistency.

  • Cross-team hiring workspace design
  • Deeper ATS, API, or data handoff needs
  • Governance, access, and audit requirements
  • Phased expansion by geography or function
Scope enterprise fit →
How buyers expand

Most teams don’t need everything on day one. They need one painful bottleneck solved well.

That usually means proving stronger shortlists first, then layering on interviews, recruiter workflows, and deeper operational automation once the business case is clear.

01

Prove shortlist clarity

Start where applicant overload is slowing down screening and review quality.

02

Add evidence-backed evaluation

Bring interview outputs, rubrics, and rationale into one structured decision layer.

03

Scale recruiter control

Expand with permissions, routing, handoffs, and governance suited to a larger hiring operation.

What changes the price

The real drivers are role volume, workflow depth, and coordination complexity.

We scope pricing around how your team actually hires, so you can match investment to business impact instead of guessing from a generic feature table.

Volume

How many applicants and roles you need to process

  • Open role count and applicant load
  • Interview completion expectations
  • Screening throughput targets
Workflow depth

How much decision structure and automation you want

  • Scorecards, rubrics, and evidence packaging
  • Routing, reminders, and multi-stage automation
  • Recruiter approvals and handoff logic
Operational control

How much governance and integration complexity sits underneath

  • ATS, API, or reporting integrations
  • Permissions and audit visibility
  • Multi-team or multi-region rollout needs
Next step

We’ll recommend the right starting plan in one working session.

You’ll leave with a tighter pilot scope, the right product modules, and a clearer path to evidence-backed hiring decisions.